latest
Critics of theism and Christianity claim not only that God is dead but that He never truly existed in the first place. For if the God of Christianity truly exists, then why is there so much pain and suffering in the world? Atheists and Christians alike call this apparent conundrum; “The Problem of Evil.” The logical problem of evil presents as a question: “If the God of Christianity is omnipotent (all-powerful), omniscient (all-knowing), and omnibenevolent (all-caring), then why is there evil in the world?” Did God create the evil that befalls man? If He, in fact, did not create evil, then where did it come from? Is God’s “good” creation not as good as advertised? Couldn’t God have created a world without evil? Or maybe one with less evil? The list of questions goes on and on. For the critic, the fact that there is evil and suffering in the world proves not only that God is dead but that He never existed in the first place. On the other hand, for the Christian, the existence of God and the existence of evil and suffering in the world are compatible realities.
Read more…And Then What Happened?
Read moreDEAR ABBY: I am a 67-year-old man who has two sisters. Recently, I was at my younger sister “Mitzi’s” house, installing some blinds. While there, I received a phone call from my girlfriend. (We have been together nine months, after my wife passed last year.) My girlfriend and I were discussing finances, including the topic of my older sister, “Carolyn,” borrowing money last year.
Read moreFRIDAY, AUGUST 15, 2025
Read moreWEDNESDAY, AUGUST 13, 2025
Read moreTUESDAY, AUGUST 12, 2025
Read moreOver the past few weeks, we have considered the evidence supporting the concept that at one time in the ancient past, all of humanity was gathered together as one people of one race and culture, speaking one language. Christians hold that there were only eight survivors after the Great Flood: Noah and his family. Over the next few generations, everyone on Earth was still gathered as one group at a single palace, at Babel, on The Plains of Shinar. God had commanded the people to multiply and fill the Earth, but they refused. God’s solution was to confuse their universal language, forcing each family to migrate in different directions away from Babel and away from one another. There are compelling reasons suggesting that most of the 270 known “Great Flood” stories from around the world originated from a single source. The similarities between most of the 270 stories are striking: there is a focus on one wise and righteous man destined to survive the flood, the building of an ark which is described in detail; animals brought on board to preserve the species; the hero of the story sends out birds to see if they can find dry land; after the floodwater subsides sacrifices are made by the hero to mend mankind’s relationship with the divine; and finally, the survivors repopulate the Earth. It seems that the best explanation of the facts is that there was one Flood story, the original Flood story, and that story was subsequently conveyed orally over the generations and across cultures, giving rise to almost all of these 270 ancient Flood stories. Last week, we presented evidence from linguists that suggests all of the 6,000 languages that are spoken today originate from one of what is likely only 78 proto-language families that were given to mankind by God at the scattering of the people at Babel. Both ancient Flood stories and studies from linguistics point to a bottleneck— to a time in history when there was only one very large family on Earth, and all people were gathered together. Even so, there is still another source of evidence to support this claim. It provides a very strong argument that there truly was a world Flood and that a few generations later, the survivors were given new languages and scattered across the land. That source of evidence comes from genetics. Simple mathematics dictate that each generation only possesses one-half of the DNA from the previous generation. Genetically speaking, each person is one-half of each parent, onefourth of each grandparent, one-eighth of each great-grandparent, and so on. This is called DNA signal dilution. This analogy makes it easy to see that our ancestor’s DNA is only detectable going back a few generations. And yet, if that is the case, how do geneticists trace DNA lines, called haplogroups, back thousands of years? It turns out that there is a source of DNA that is not halved each generation but rather is handed down in its entirety to each generation found on the Y-chromosome in males. In other words, Y-chromosomal DNA is handed down from father to son unchanged. The Y-chromosome is an interesting molecule with some 60 million base amino acids in linear length, experiencing some minor gene mixing with the X-chromosome at the ends of the strand. While this mixing impacts about ten percent of the whole chromosome molecule, the remaining 90 percent of the sequence is unaltered except for occasional mutations. It turns out that these occasional mutations lend themselves to developing dating models that scientists call molecular clocks. In fact, the Y-chromosomal mutation rate is observed to be three mutations per generation. Using this information, molecular clocks are then used to backtrack and count how many generations a person’s Y-chromosomal DNA has been handed down. Y-chromosomal DNA sequencing also determines what particular haplogroup and subgroup a person belongs to and from what geographical region the haplogroup originated. Using these generic sequencing tools researchers have made some incredible discoveries.
Read more