WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 15, 2025
Read moreTUESDAY, JANUARY 14, 2025
Read moreSUNDAY, JANUARY 12, 2025
Read moreSay, do you have rats at home? I’m talking about critters with fuzzy ears and whiskers who slither around the house after dark, pick up crumbs, and eat from the dog’s bowl.
Read moreI’ve got one of those coffee mugs that have “Gibb’s Rules” printed on it. If you remember, Jethro Gibbs is the experienced, grizzled chief of the NCIS law enforcement agents. There are 46 of these rules and some of them are self-evident, such as “never let suspects sit together,” and “There is no third best.“ My favorite is “I don’t believe in coincidences.”
Read moreIn the last few weeks, we have looked more closely at “swoon theories” that attempt to explain what happened to Jesus of Nazareth after His crucifixion. Specifically, we looked at the recent swoon theory offered by the critic David Mirsch. Mirsch’s theory, like all previous swoon-type theories, fails to account for the minimal bedrock facts suggested by Gary Habermas and Michael Licona. These minimal bedrock facts are facts pertaining to the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus that are; 1) broadly evidenced, and 2) acknowledged by a consensus of scholars both believers and skeptics alike. First, Mirsch’s theory fails to acknowledge that Jesus did in fact die by crucifixion. Further, given the extent of Jesus’s injuries, Mirsch fails to provide an adequate explanation of how a severely injured Jesus could have made multiple appearances to His disciples over a forty-day period. Finally, Mirsch fails to acknowledge that Paul had an experience that he interpreted to be an appearance of the risen Jesus to him. In conclusion, post haste, we set all swoon-type theories aside as invalid explanations for what happened to Jesus after the crucifixion.
Read moreFRIDAY, JANUARY 10, 2025
Read more